MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advanced Noise-Shaping SAR ADCs Utilizing Single-Capacitor Arbitrary-Resolution DACs for Miniaturized Neural Interfaces

2023· article· en· W4390993506 on OpenAlexaff
Jianxiong Xu, Shiying Wu, Hao You, Jose De Sales Filho, Mustafa Kanchwala, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuccessive approximation ADCCapacitorElectronic engineeringNoise shapingSpurious-free dynamic rangeRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceEffective number of bitsNoise (video)EngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development and validation of a high-performance Noise-Shaping (NS) Successive-Approximation-Register (SAR) Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) specifically tailored for low-power, high-density Implantable Neural Interfaces (INIs). The proposed design introduces a novel approach to the Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC) formation within the NS-SAR ADC, utilizing a single capacitor to achieve arbitrarily-high resolution. It minimizes distortion due to mismatches of conventionally used capacitor banks and reduces the NS-SAR ADC area, enabling higher resolution without a proportional increase in area. Furthermore, our design addresses the challenges of kickback noise and lossy integration, improving overall performance and signal integrity during the conversion process. Simulation and experimental results substantiate the performance of the proposed noise-shaping SAR ADC. The ADC demonstrated a high peak signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio (SNDR) of 89 dB. Moreover, it proved its robustness across different frequencies and capacitor mismatches, maintaining an SNDR of 70dB even with a 10% mismatch of the capacitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207