Development of quantum dot materials for infrared cameras (Final CRADA Report)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this project was to develop scalable methods to produce infrared (IR) mercury telluride (HgTe) colloidal quantum dot (CQD) thin films and demonstrate their utility in a proof-of-concept monolithic SWIR focal plane array (FPA). These objectives were accomplished by scaling up the HgTe CQD synthesis, characterizing physical and electrical properties of HgTe CQDs, evaluating solution-processed coating methods for quality and efficiency, and developing a process flow to integrate HgTe CQDs with commercial-off-the-shelf silicon CMOS readout circuits by solution-processed coating to produce monolithic FPAs. The FPA is the image sensor in an infrared imaging system responsible for detecting and processing reflected or emitted light into an infrared image of the scene under observation. The quality of the image is determined by the sensitivity and resolution of the image sensor in the system. Higher resolution IR FPAs enable higher throughput in manufacturing quality assurance, wider field of view for autonomous navigation, and longer range surveillance for defense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".