MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391005721 · doi:10.1007/s10877-023-01115-0

Cerebral autoregulation derived blood pressure targets in elective neurosurgery

2024· article· en· W4391005721 on OpenAlex
Erta Beqiri, Marta García-Orellana, Anna Politi, Frederick A. Zeiler, Michał M. Placek, Neus Fàbregas, Jeanette Tas, Veerle De Sloovere, Marek Czosnyka, Marcel Aries, R. Valero, Nicolás de Riva, Peter Smielewski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGates Cambridge TrustCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationResearch ManitobaMedical Research CouncilHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaAutoregulationCerebral autoregulationNeurosurgeryAnesthesiologyBlood pressureNeurologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Poor postoperative outcomes may be associated with cerebral ischaemia or hyperaemia, caused by episodes of arterial blood pressure (ABP) being outside the range of cerebral autoregulation (CA). Monitoring CA using COx (correlation between slow changes in mean ABP and regional cerebral O 2 saturation—rSO 2 ) could allow to individualise the management of ABP to preserve CA. We aimed to explore a continuous automated assessment of ABP OPT (ABP where CA is best preserved) and ABP at the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA) in elective neurosurgery patients. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 85 patients [median age 60 (IQR 51–68)] undergoing elective neurosurgery. ABP BASELINE was the mean of 3 pre-operative non-invasive measurements. ABP and rSO 2 waveforms were processed to estimate COx-derived ABP OPT and LLA trend-lines. We assessed: availability (number of patients where ABP OPT /LLA were available); time required to achieve first values; differences between ABP OPT /LLA and ABP. ABP OPT and LLA availability was 86 and 89%. Median (IQR) time to achieve the first value was 97 (80–155) and 93 (78–122) min for ABP OPT and LLA respectively. Median ABP OPT [75 (69–84)] was lower than ABP BASELINE [90 (84–95)] ( p < 0.001, Mann-U test). Patients spent 72 (56–86) % of recorded time with ABP above or below ABP OPT ± 5 mmHg. ABP OPT and ABP time trends and variability were not related to each other within patients. 37.6% of patients had at least 1 hypotensive insult (ABP < LLA) during the monitoring time. It seems possible to assess individualised automated ABP targets during elective neurosurgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it