Distributed temporal–spatial neighbourhood enhanced variational autoencoder for multiunit industrial plant‐wide process monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Process monitoring plays an essential role in ensuring the safe and efficient operation of multi‐unit plantwide industrial processes. However, complicated nonlinear dynamics of these processes pose enormous challenges to the plantwide process monitoring approaches. In this paper, a novel distributed temporal–spatial neighbourhood enhanced variational autoencoder (DTS‐VAE) monitoring scheme is proposed. The scheme selects the temporal and spatial neighbourhood sets of a current sample from a local unit. Time‐series correlation is utilized to construct temporal representative samples to obtain process dynamic characteristics. Likewise, spatial similarity is employed to construct spatial representative samples to obtain spatial patterns in the data. Then the reconstructed and current samples serve as the inputs for a variational autoencoder to extract features from the current sample and its neighbourhoods. Subsequently, a distributed monitor that considers the temporal–spatial characteristics is established for each unit. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation index is developed using Bayesian fusion strategy to improve monitoring performance. The proposed DTS‐VAE monitoring scheme was effectively verified on the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process and a wastewater treatment plant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".