MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PENGARUH KEMAMPUAN PEMIMPIN KEPALA DESA TERHADAP PENERAPAN GOOD VILLAGE GOVERNANCE DI DESA JEBLOGAN, KECAMATAN PARON, KABUPATEN NGAWI

2023· article· en· W4391012176 on OpenAlexaff
Hafids Haryonno, Muhammad Farid Ma’ruf

Bibliographic record

VenuePublika · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticCorporate governanceGood governanceGovernment (linguistics)Value (mathematics)Test (biology)Political scienceBusinessPublic relationsMathematicsStatisticsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate the influence of the leadership skills of the Jeblogan Village Head on the implementation of Good Village Governance. This research uses a quantitative approach by collecting data through questionnaires distributed to the people of Jeblogan Village. The probability sample method was used to select research samples based on predetermined criteria with 115 respondents involved. The results of data analysis show that the coefficient path between the leader ability constructs produces a t-statistic value of 19.227 and a p-value of 0.000, with the test criteria that with an alpha value (a) = 5%, the coefficient path is declared significant if the t-statistic value is more than 1.96 and the p-value is less than 0.05. Thus, the ability of the leader of the Jeblogan Village Head has a positive and significant influence on the implementation of Good Village Governance. This indicates that the higher the leader's ability to lead and manage the village, the better the implementation of good governance principles in Jeblogan Village. These findings have important implications for village development in Indonesia. Greater attention needs to be given to the development of leadership skills for the Jeblogan Village Head and other village leaders, so that they can be effective in implementing Good Village Governance. In addition, stakeholders, both government and community, also need to support and actively participate in efforts to improve the implementation of good governance principles at the village level. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi pengaruh kemampuan pemimpin Kepala Desa Jeblogan terhadap penerapan Good Village Governance. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan pengumpulkan data melalui kuesioner yang dibagikan kepada masyarakat Desa Jeblogan. Metode sampel probabilitas digunakan untuk memilih sampel penelitian berdasarkan kriteria yang telah ditetapkan dengan responden yang terlibat sebanyak 115. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa jalur koefisien antara konstruk kemampuan pemimpin menghasilkan nilai t-statistik sebesar 19,227 dan nilai p-value sebesar 0,000, dengan kriteria pengujian bahwa dengan nilai alpha (a) = 5%, jalur koefisien dinyatakan signifikan jika nilai t-statistic lebih dari 1,96 dan nilai p-value kurang dari 0,05. Sehingga, kemampuan pemimpin Kepala Desa Jeblogan memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap penerapan Good Village Governance. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin tinggi kemampuan pemimpin dalam memimpin dan mengelola desa, semakin baik penerapan prinsip-prinsip tata kelola yang baik di Desa Jeblogan. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi penting bagi pengembangan desa di Indonesia. Diperlukan perhatian yang lebih besar terhadap pengembangan kemampuan kepemimpinan bagi Kepala Desa Jeblogan dan pemimpin desa lainnya, agar mereka dapat efektif dalam menerapkan Good Village Governance. Selain itu, para pemangku kepentingan, baik pemerintah maupun masyarakat, juga perlu mendukung dan berpartisipasi aktif dalam upaya meningkatkan penerapan prinsip-prinsip tata kelola yang baik di tingkat desa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublikaSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207