MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391014774 · doi:10.1002/9781394180523.ch18

Massive Unsourced Random Access

2024· other· en· W4391014774 on OpenAlexaff
Volodymyr Shyianov, Faouzi Bellili, Amine Mezghani, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom accessComputer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter introduces unsourced random access (URA) as a new non-orthogonal multiple access protocol popularized for its effectiveness in handling traffic from many machine-type devices (MTDs). Due to the need for sporadic access and short-packet transmission in large networks of MTDs, traditional grant-based access schemes that require large scheduling overhead fall short in terms of spectral efficiency and latency which are two key performance metrics in next-generation wireless systems. The first part of this chapter focuses on URA in the context of single-antenna base station with the problem formulation, information theoretic analysis, as well common algorithmic approaches. In the second part, we discuss the system model in the context of multi-antenna base station as well as outline the key distinctions with the single-antenna counterpart, we then conduct a detailed study of the best-known algorithmic solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207