Attention Graph Convolutional Network for Disjoint Hyperspectral Image Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are employed extensively in remote sensing due to their capacity to capture intricate features from a broad range of object patterns, irrespective of object size, shape or color. These networks excel at extracting high-frequency spectral information such as angles, edges and outlines. The classification boundary zone, however, becomes hazy for CNNs because they learn characteristics by means of a fixed shape kernel concentrated on the central pixel, and can perform poorly in image classification at class boundaries. Additionally, CNNs are not designed to capture global relations. Thus, in this letter, we propose an Attention Graph Convolutional Network (Attention-GCN) as a solution to the aforementioned shortcomings. The developed model illustrated a high level of superiority over several CNN and ViT-based models. For example, in the Augsburg data benchmark, the developed algorithm exhibited an average accuracy of 61.11%, substantially outperforming other models such as HybridSN, iFormer, Efficient Former, GCN, CoAtNet, 2D-CNN, 3D-CNN, and ResNet by approximately 9, 13, 14, 15, 18, 24, 25 and 29 percentage points, respectively. The code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/aj1365/AGCN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".