An Interval Predictor-Based Robust Control for a Class of Constrained Nonlinear Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes the design of a robust sampled-time controller to stabilize continuous-time nonlinear systems, taking into account state and input constraints. The proposed controller comprises the design of a robust control law, which is based on an interval predictor-based state-feedback controller and a Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach, which deals with the state and input constraints. The interval predictor-based state-feedback controller is designed based on a Lyapunov function approach that provides a safe set, where the state constraints are not transgressed. Out this set, the MPC is activated guaranteeing the fulfillment of the state and input constraints. The proposed switched control strategy guarantees the practical Uniform Asymptotic Stability of the considered nonlinear systems. A constructive method, based on linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), is proposed to compute the controller gains and the state of the system is not required. Some simulation results illustrate the feasibility of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it