MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Load Balancing Architecture to Improve the Security of Cloud Computing in the Disease Management Centers

2023· article· en· W4391021138 on OpenAlexaff
Ashween Ganesh, Rakesh Ramakrishnan, Adithya Kiran Sekar, J. Logeshwaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingLoad balancing (electrical power)ProvisioningScalabilityServerWorkloadRound-robin DNSDistributed computingComputer networkReliability (semiconductor)Cloud computing securityOperating systemThe InternetDomain Name System

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing has been increasingly adopted by many health organizations in order to improve the security and performance of their information systems. One of the main techniques used for this purpose is the implementation of load balancing architectures for disease management centers. Load balancing can help ensure scalability, reliability and security of a large network. This means that the server nodes in a cloud system can be automatically provisioned to ensure that only a certain amount of workload is placed onto each server, and if one server fails, the load gets distributed to other servers in the cloud. The main purpose of load balancing architectures for disease management centers is to ensure that the multiple server nodes are evenly distributing the workload and providing fast, secure, and reliable access to the data stored within the cloud. By using a distributed infrastructure approach, a cloud-based application can be designed in such a manner that allows for consistent and secure data access even during times of failure and other unpredictable events. Load balancing architectures can also enable organizations to identify potential security threats and incidents in real-time. By monitoring the data access between various networks and users, cloud-based security systems can be deployed to identify and nullify these threats before they cause any damage to the system or its data. Additionally, the load balancing techniques allow organizations to analyze the network data and user behavior to determine any potential security threats quickly and accurately. The load balancing architectures are essential in ensuring the scalability, reliability, and security of disease management resources and systems. By automatically managing the server nodes, load balancing technologies are able to provide fast and secure access to organizational data. Moreover, the technology enables organizations to identify potential security threats and incidents in real-time. Thus, an organization that utilizes the load balancing architecture in its cloud computing system can enjoy improved security of its resources and user data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207