MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design of a Gateway Module for Multi-protocol Industrial Connected Objects and Cloud Services

2023· article· en· W4391021360 on OpenAlexaff
Aurèle Jacquin, Tony Wong, Julio Montecinos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingMQTTModbusGateway (web page)Communications protocolInternetworkingComputer networkGateway addressH.248Network packetRobustness (evolution)The InternetDefault gatewayEmbedded systemOperating systemInternet of ThingsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) offers many new opportunities. Nonetheless, their adoption can be complex since traditional industrial "objects" are tailored to their very specific application environment. These objects are often incompatible with newer IIoT-ready devices. Incorporating them into an industrial facility may require network restructuring that can entail significant costs. However, add-on solutions exist that can keep the upgrading costs to a reasonable level. This has been made possible by emerging commodity off-the-shelf gateways that can act as intermediaries between industrial objects and cloud services.Gateways are usually not designed to handle many communication protocols, and choosing the right gateway can be challenging. The gateway device presented in this article was designed to solve this problem by implementing multiple protocols within an open-source environment. The implemented protocols are Modbus, Canbus, MQTT and REST. Furthermore, the proposed gateway architecture can facilitate the implementation of new protocols. Several dozen tests have been carried out in an experimental environment to cover the most common application cases, thus illustrating the robustness of the gateway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207