Structural stability of subsonic steady states to the hydrodynamic model for semiconductors with sonic boundary
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The hydrodynamic model for semiconductors with sonic boundary, represented by Euler–Poisson equations, possesses the various physical steady states including interior-subsonic/interior-supersonic/shock-transonic/ C 1 -smooth-transonic steady states. Since these physical steady states result in some serious singularities at the sonic boundary (their gradients are infinity), this makes that the structural stability for these physical solutions is more difficult and challenging, and has remained open as we know. In this paper, we investigate the structural stability of interior subsonic steady states. Namely, when the doping profiles are as small perturbations, the differences between the corresponding subsonic solutions are also small. To overcome the singularities at the sonic boundary, we propose a novel approach, which combines the weighted multiplier technique, local singularity analysis, monotonicity argument and squeezing skill. Both the result itself and the technique developed here will give us some truly enlightening insights into our follow-up study on the structural stability of the remaining types of solutions. A number of numerical approximations are also carried out, which intuitively confirm our theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it