MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391031930 · doi:10.1080/19320248.2024.2305408

Residential Mobility and Its Impact on Self-Rated General and Mental Health Among Young Indigenous Adults: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Food Insecurity

2024· article· en· W4391031930 on OpenAlex
Lei Chai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityIndigenousMental healthPsychologyEnvironmental healthDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyFood securityGeographyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the relationship between residential mobility and self-rated health among Indigenous adults aged 19–24, exploring whether food insecurity acts as a mediator or moderator in this relationship. Data were collected from the 2017 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, a nationally representative survey administered by Statistics Canada (N = 4,028). Logistic regression analysis revealed that food insecurity fully mediated the negative effects of residential mobility on self-rated general and mental health. Furthermore, food insecurity amplified the negative impacts of residential mobility on both health outcomes. These results underscore the importance of implementing culturally specific interventions to address food insecurity among young Indigenous adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it