Roflumilast Cream 0.3% in Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Individual Patient PASI and PASI-HD Responses: Pooled DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 Phase 3 Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Roflumilast cream 0.3% is a highly potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved as a nonsteroidal, once-daily treatment for patients with plaque psoriasis. Pooled efficacy and safety results from two Phase 3 clinical trials (DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2) have been presented previously. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is used to assess the severity of plaque psoriasis in clinical trials; however, PASI is not precise when the area of involvement is <10% of a given anatomic region. A modified version of the PASI, the PASI-high discrimination (PASI-HD), allows more precise assessment of psoriasis in body regions where <10% area is affected. We present individual patient responses using PASI and PASI-HD. Methods: Patients aged ≥2 years with at least mild plaque psoriasis involving 2-20% body surface area were randomized 2:1 to apply roflumilast cream 0.3% or vehicle cream once daily for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success (score of Clear or Almost Clear plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at Week 8. PASI and PASI-HD were used to measure disease severity; individual patient PASI and PASI-HD responses were plotted graphically. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated and were reported previously. Results: Roflumilast- and vehicle-treated patients had similar baseline demographic and disease characteristics. At Week 8, statistically significantly more roflumilast- than vehicle-treated patients achieved IGA Success (39.9% vs. 6.5%; P<0.0001). Statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast were observed at Week 8 for percentages of patients achieving a 50% reduction in PASI (72.1% vs. 25.5%; P<0.0001), 75% reduction (40.3% vs. 6.5%, P<0.0001), 90% reduction (19.7% vs 2.3%; P<0.0001), and 100% reduction (12.3% vs 0.8%; P<0.001). Likewise, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast were observed at Week 8 for percentages of patients achieving 50% reduction in PASI-HD (79.4% vs. 33.1%; P<0.0001), 75% reduction (59.9% vs. 17.9%, P<0.0001), 90% reduction (39.9% vs 9.1%; P<0.0001), and 100% reduction (12.3% vs 0.8%; P<0.0001). Roflumilast cream demonstrated low rates of application-site adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs, comparable to vehicle. At the first application of roflumilast cream 0.3% (day 1), 96% of patients reported no or mild sensation, increasing to 99% of patients at Weeks 4 and 8. Conclusions: Roflumilast cream 0.3% provided greater improvement in IGA Success, PASI, and PASI-HD versus vehicle with favorable safety and tolerability in patients with psoriasis in two Phase 3 trials. PASI-HD provided higher discrimination of effects of treatment in areas with <10% involvement than the traditional PASI. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: DERMIS-1: NCT04211363; DERMIS-2: NCT04211389 Financial Disclosures: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".