MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391039424 · doi:10.31579/2694-0248/054

Modern Medicine and its Importance in Human Life

2023· article· en· W4391039424 on OpenAlexaff
Gusyev Valentyn

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Sciences
Canadian institutionsPedorthic Research Foundation of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModern medicineOrder (exchange)Intensive care medicineSurgeryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to give a correct assessment of the work of medicine, you must first answer the question, what is medicine is a science? Most often it is evaluated by achievements in the field of surgery. Although well-known surgeons often say that most operations could not be done, not brought to them. In general, today there is a significant increase in diseases. Analyzing the problems of deformities of the feet, the spine, the replacement of joints of the lower extremities, heart diseases, when it comes to arterial blood flow disorders, the approaches that are used as a treatment are striking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Trauma CareSame topicMedical and Biological SciencesFrench-language works237,207