MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391041883 · doi:10.61784/wjafs240138

ENVIRONMENTAL COST ANALYSIS OF CHEMICAL PREVENTION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES OF CROP DISEASES AND PESTS

2024· article· en· W4391041883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental pollutionPesticideBiodiversityCropCrop protectionEnvironmental sciencePest controlPollutionBusinessEnvironmental protectionToxicologyAgroforestryBiotechnologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes the causes and categories of environmental costs of chemical prevention and control technologies for crop pests and diseases, and points out that soil pollution, water pollution, fishery losses, pest resistance, natural enemy populations and biodiversity losses, bee product losses, and bee pollination losses are the main environmental Cost category. A preliminary analysis was made of the economic impact of each category of environmental costs, and it was initially calculated that the environmental costs incurred by my country's use of pesticides to prevent and control crop diseases and insect pests are at least 39.4 to 118.7 yuan/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it