MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391044918 · doi:10.1101/2024.01.18.576245

Self-Supervised Transformer Model Training for a Sleep-EEG Foundation Model

2024· preprint· en· W4391044918 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mattson Ogg, William G. Coon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institutes of HealthCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of WashingtonYork UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsTransformerElectroencephalographyComputer scienceSleep (system call)Foundation (evidence)Artificial intelligencePsychologyEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageNeurosciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recognizes five sleep/wake states (Wake, N1, N2, N3, REM), yet this classification schema provides only a high-level summary of sleep and likely overlooks important neurological or health information. New, data-driven approaches are needed to more deeply probe the information content of sleep signals. Here we present a self-supervised approach that learns the structure embedded in large quantities of neurophysiological sleep data. This masked transformer training procedure is inspired by high performing self-supervised methods developed for speech transcription. We show that self-supervised pre-training matches or outperforms supervised sleep stage classification, especially when labeled data or compute-power is limited. Perhaps more importantly, we also show that our pretrained model is flexible and can be fine-tuned to perform well on new tasks including distinguishing individuals and quantifying "brain age" (a potential health biomarker). This suggests that modern methods can automatically learn information that is potentially overlooked by the 5-class sleep staging schema, laying the groundwork for new schemas and further data-driven exploration of sleep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207