Spaceflight alters host-gut microbiota interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rodent habitat on the International Space Station has provided crucial insights into the impact of spaceflight on mammals, including observation of symptoms characteristic of liver disease, insulin resistance, osteopenia and myopathy. Although these physiological responses can involve the microbiome when observed on Earth, changes in host-microbiota interactions during spaceflight are still being elucidated. Here, NASA GeneLab multiomic data from the Rodent Research 6 mission are used to determine changes to gut microbiota and murine host colon and liver gene expression after 29 and 56-days of spaceflight. Using hybrid amplicon and whole metagenome sequencing analysis, significant spaceflight-associated alterations to 42 microbiome species were identified. These included relative reductions of bacteria associated with bile acid and butyrate metabolism, such as Extibacter muris and Dysosmobacter welbionis. Functional prediction suggested over-representation of fatty acid and bile acid metabolism, extracellular matrix interactions, and antibiotic resistance genes within the gut microbiome, while host intestinal and hepatic gene expression described corresponding changes to host bile acid and energy metabolism, and immune suppression from spaceflight. Taken together, these changes imply that interactions at the host-gut microbiome interface contribute to spaceflight pathology and highlight how these interactions might critically influence human health and the feasibility of long-duration spaceflight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".