MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391045261 · doi:10.3934/geosci.2024002

Energy and tellurium deposits

2024· article· en· W4391045261 on OpenAlexaff
Jianzhao Yin, Haoyu Yin, Yuhong Chao, Hongyun Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Geosciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelluriumResource (disambiguation)Earth scienceGeologyComputer scienceGeochemistryNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<abstract> <p>In this article, we focus on the next generation of green batteries that are closely related to semi-metallic tellurium and its deposits. We briefly summarize the chemical and geochemical characteristics of tellurium that ordinary readers are not familiar with or have never heard of, and its important role in many fields such as high-tech and medical care, current global resource distribution, major mineral extraction and purification technologies and market evolution, etc. The spatiotemporal distribution of the two main types of tellurium deposits, namely associated tellurium deposits and independent tellurium deposits, is introduced in detail. The geological and geochemical characteristics of the only independent tellurium deposit in the world are introduced in detail, so that relevant researchers can use this deposit as an example to discover more independent tellurium deposits around the world, meeting people's increasingly urgent demand for tellurium and realizing the sustainable development of human society. We believe that humans will discover more and more new energy metals in the near future to meet the dual goals of protecting the earth's environment and developing the economy, which are contradictory and mutually reinforcing. New generation of energy metal batteries must be small, compact, easy to carry, charge quickly, and have a long life.</p> </abstract>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS GeosciencesSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207