MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391045349 · doi:10.31579/2694-0248/060

Feet Pumping Function

2023· article· en· W4391045349 on OpenAlexaff
Gusyev Valentyn

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Training Studies
Canadian institutionsPedorthic Research Foundation of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingAnatomyBlood circulationBiomechanicsLymphArchFoot (prosody)MedicineEngineeringPathologyStructural engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the point of view of the physiology of the body, the foot muscles perform one of the most important physiological functions - pumping. Lymph and blood circulation provide the process of cell metabolism, maintaining its energy state. One of the conditions for maintaining effective lymph and blood circulation is correct walking biomechanics, i.e., nature laid down the sequence of muscle contraction, which cannot be the deformation of the arches of the feet, the use of shoes, limiting the work of the muscles of the feet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Trauma CareSame topicPhysical Education and Training StudiesFrench-language works237,207