MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391051463 · doi:10.1177/23996544241227159

Hong Kong’s new normal: Remaking authorized discourses of “special administration,” 2017–2022

2024· article· en· W4391051463 on OpenAlexafffund
Jamie Peck, Chris Meulbroek, Dimitar Anguelov

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Planning C Politics and Space · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCommunismChinaAdministration (probate law)Political scienceGovernment (linguistics)Corporate governancePoliticsBasic lawPublic administrationLawCapitalismPolitical economySociologyManagementConstitutionEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a critical discourse analysis of the five annual policy addresses of Hong Kong's chief executive, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-Ngor, whose term of office (2017-2022) spanned the most tumultuous episode in the modern history of the territory, one bisected by an extended season of street protests and the subsequent imposition of a national security law. Read as an authorized, real-time transcript of governmental rationalizations and responses, delivered in the first-person voice of Hong Kong's most senior politician, the annual policy addresses narrate a crisis-mediated shift from a postcolonial redoubt of liberal capitalism to an outpost of China's national-security state. Although the "one country, two systems" formula enshrined in Hong Kong's Basic Law retains its official status, a distinct transformation is evident, from the evocation of "two systems" as a wedge against one-country assimilation, to an apparently new normal based on the principles of securitized, "one-country" integration. In the process, the chief executive increasingly embraced the received discourses and sanctioned priorities of the Chinese Communist Party in her depictions of a "New Paradigm" for the governance of Hong Kong, founded on the "steer of the Central Government" with the "cooperation" of the government of the Special Administrative Region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment and Planning C Politics and SpaceSame topicHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsFrench-language works237,207