MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391060469 · doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2023.11.022

Transaction cost analysis of corporate sustainability: The influence of profit management, audit committee, and women board directors

2024· article· en· W4391060469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUncertain Supply Chain Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingBusinessAudit committeeStock exchangeFinanceReturn on assetsEarnings managementNonprobability samplingEarnings per shareEarnings

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main criterion of a company is its financial performance. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of Profit Management, Audit Committee, and Female Director Characteristics on firm sustainability as measured by financial performance at companies in the real estate construction sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Profit Management, Audit Committee, and Female Director Characteristics are independent factors, while company sustainability is dependent. Financial performance is the control variable. Discretionary Terms Net Profit - Cash and Cash Equivalents / Total Assets t-1) is used to measure earnings management, while ROA (Return on Assets) is used to measure financial performance. The data used in this study are secondary. The subjects of this study include 17 companies in the real estate construction sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Purposive sampling was used to collect data for this study and data were obtained from eight companies. Classical hypothesis testing, multiple linear regression testing, coefficient of determination testing, path analysis and hypothesis testing are the analytical methods used. Based on the results, it can be concluded that earnings management has a positive and significant impact on financial performance; Audit committee has a positive and significant impact on financial performance; Characteristics of female directors have a positive and significant impact on financial performance; financial performance has a positive and significant impact on corporate sustainability; and financial performance can mediate the relationship between financial performance and corporate sustainability. Accordingly, strengthening earnings management, audit committees and the special role of female directors must be considered to improve a company's financial performance. Earnings management, audit committees and the characteristics of good female directors can then improve corporate sustainability. It will be higher if supported by strong financial performance. Earnings management, audit committees and female director characteristics can be optimized if supported by good financial performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it