A comprehensive survey of contemporary supply chain management practices in charting the digital age revolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new era of supply chain management has been brought about by the digital age, which is completely changing the way companies organize, carry out, and maximize their operations. This survey report provides an in-depth analysis of supply chain management's present situation in this digital environment. Utilizing a comprehensive analysis of extant literature, papers, and studies, it pinpoints and investigates the pivotal patterns, obstacles, and prospects that enterprises encounter when adopting digital technology inside their supply chains. This article explores the range of digital technologies, including blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and the Internet of Things (IoT), that have transformed supply chain management. We provide a classified overview of the area by examining the data from many sources and emphasizing recurring elements that characterize the contemporary supply chain environment. We also take into account the effects of digitalization on corporate operations, such as the difficulties associated with data protection, the necessity of change management, and the possibility of increased productivity. Case studies of industry leaders who have successfully transitioned to the digital era shed light on best practices and offer useful insights. Looking forward, we offer a glimpse into the future of supply chain management, predicting and discussing emerging trends and technologies, such as 5G connectivity and sustainability initiatives. This paper concludes with a call to action, emphasizing the importance of staying ahead in the digital age for organizations seeking to remain competitive, agile, and resilient in an ever-evolving business landscape. It also suggests areas for future research and development, guiding further exploration in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".