Supervision of Teaching and Learning Managements by Educational Institution Administrators Under the Jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research aims to: 1) Investigate the results of supervision of teaching and learning managements by educational institution administrators under the jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. This is a survey research. The samples in the study include 1) 97 educational institution administrators under the jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2: 2) 97 teachers under the jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 These participants were selected using simple random method, totaling 194 people. The tools used in this research are 1) a Document analysis form, and 2) a Questionnaire concerning the supervision of teaching and learning managements of schools under the jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Data was analyzed qualitatively using content analysis and presented in a descriptive analysis format. The results of the study found that; The supervision of teaching and learning managements by educational institution administrators under the jurisdiction of Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 is generally at the highest level. When considering specific issues, it was found that; in terms of blended learning, the administrators have supported the learning process through online electronic media; in terms of collaborative lesson development, the administrators have identified lesson development issues from classroom problems; and in terms of teaching tasks and mentoring system, the administrators have fostered relationships with teachers in managing teaching and learning teaching and learning managements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".