Dampak Pariwisata Terhadap Kondisi Sosial, Ekonomi dan Lingkungan (Studi Kasus di Desa Wisata Lerep Kabupaten Semarang)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desa wisata Lerep adalah salah satu desa wisata di Kabupaten Semarang. Desa wisata ini memiliki potensi berupa wisata alam dan wisata buatan yang mengusung tema alam dan budaya. Sejak ditetapkan sebagai desa wisata di tahun 2015, saat ini Desa Wisata Lerep tergolong sebagai desa wisata maju dimana masyarakat sudah mampu mengelola usaha pariwisata melalui pokdarwis maupun BUMDes. Sebagai desa wisata maju, tentunya banyak dampak yang dihasilkan dari kegiatan pariwisata di Desa Lerep. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali dampak pariwisata dalam aspek sosial, ekonomi dan lingkungan di Desa Lerep. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif deskriptif dimana data dihimpun melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan wisata menimbulkan baik dampak positif maupun negatif. Dari aspek sosial, kegiatan wisata memberikan dampak dalam hal semangat masyarakat dalam membangun desa, dan pendidikan masyarakat. Dari aspek ekonomi, kegiatan wisata berdampak pada pendapatan dan peluang pekerjaan baru di masyarakat. Sedangkan dari aspek lingkungan, kegiatan wisata memberikan dampak pada alih fungsi lahan, persampahan dan sistem pengelolaan persampahan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".