MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391066193 · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106412

Pathologic correlates of aging-related tau astrogliopathy: ARTAG is associated with LATE-NC and cerebrovascular pathologies, but not with ADNC

2024· article· en· W4391066193 on OpenAlexaff
Yuriko Katsumata, Xian Wu, Khine Zin Aung, Kathryn Gauthreaux, Charles Mock, Shelley L. Forrest, Gábor G. Kovács, Peter T. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurobiology of Disease · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsTauopathyMedicineDementiaFrontotemporal lobar degenerationNeuropathologyNeurocognitiveArteriolosclerosisAlzheimer's diseasePathologyDiseaseFrontotemporal dementiaInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitionNeurodegeneration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Age-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG) is detectable in the brains of over one-third of autopsied persons beyond age 80, but the pathoetiology of ARTAG is poorly understood. Insights can be gained by analyzing risk factors and comorbid pathologies. Here we addressed the question of which prevalent co-pathologies are observed with increased frequency in brains with ARTAG. The study sample was the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) data set, derived from multiple Alzheimer's disease research centers (ADRCs) in the United States. Data from persons with unusual conditions (e.g. frontotemporal dementia) were excluded leaving 504 individual autopsied research participants, clustering from 20 different ADRCs, autopsied since 2020; ARTAG was reported in 222 (44.0%) of included participants. As has been shown previously, ARTAG was increasingly frequent with older age and in males. The presence and severity of other common subtypes of pathology that were previously linked to dementia were analyzed, stratifying for the presence of ARTAG. In logistical regression-based statistical models that included age and sex as covariates, ARTAG was relatively more likely to be found in brains with limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC), and in brains with comorbid cerebrovascular pathology (arteriolosclerosis and/or brain infarcts). However, ARTAG was not associated with severe Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC), or primary age-related tauopathy (PART). In a subset analysis of 167 participants with neurocognitive testing data, there was a marginal trend for ARTAG pathology to be associated with cognitive impairment as assessed with MMSE scores (P = 0.07, adjusting for age, sex, interval between final clinic visit and death, and ADNC severity). A limitation of the study was that there were missing data about ARTAG pathologies, with incomplete operationalization of ARTAG according to anatomic region and pathologic subtypes (e.g., thorn-shaped or granular-fuzzy astrocytes). In summary, ARTAG was not associated with ADNC, whereas prior observations about ARTAG occurring with increased frequency in aging, males, and brains with LATE-NC were replicated. It remains to be determined whether the increased frequency of ARTAG in brains with comorbid cerebrovascular pathology is related to local infarctions or neuroinflammatory signaling, or with some other set of correlated factors including blood-brain barrier dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurobiology of DiseaseSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207