The Flemish Reeditions of Martín de Azpilcueta’s Works: A Paratextual Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter explores the Flemish editions (whether authorised by the author or not) of Martín de Azpilcueta’s works, such as the Manual de confessors—or its Latin version, the Enchiridion sive Manvale confessariorvm et poenitentivm—and the Apologia libri de reditibvs ecclesiasticis, all published in Antwerp during his lifetime, although some posthumous editions appeared in the last quarter of the 16th century and the first two decades of the 17th century. Through the lengthy examination of paratexts and surviving correspondence this text emphasises Azpilcueta’s intentionality and authorial agency to supervise and legally protect the Antwerp editions of his works, also promoting its distribution throughout vast communities of readers living under different authorities, such as the Spanish or French kings. Finally, this chapter sheds light on Azpilcueta’s editorial intentions and active agency both as a recognised 16th-century author and in the Flemish printing world and its editorial practices, particularly those used by the celebrated Officina Plantiniana under the aegis of Christophe Plantin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".