MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Women’s Cross-Cultural Exchange in the Mid-Eighteenth Century

2023· book-chapter· en· W4391083084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maeve Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohawkCONTESTColonialismPolitical scienceGender studiesEthnologyHistorySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter tracks the journey of a Kahnawà:ke Mohawk woman in Montreal and Kahnawà:ke who deposited beaver pelts with her business partner, the French Canadian Marie-Magdalene Desauniers, who ran a discreet and illegal business. In the early part of the eighteenth century, her journey was common, if nominally illegal under the laws of New France and New York, and facilitated by women's daily cross-cultural connections. The chapter underlines that the Mohawk woman and other Mohawk traders continued to make these journeys because French and English law did not apply to them. French and English law especially did not apply in moving through Haudenosaunee territories, and traders depended on connections with Haudenosaunee traders. As the chapter shows, many of these connections were made within the mixed religious communities that both British and French officials hoped would convert Haudenosaunee individuals and secure Haudenosaunee nations as allies in the contest for control of the North American continent. The chapter concludes by noting that the intercolonial trade fit into a far older and broader tradition of wide-ranging movement. It then analyzes how Haudenosaunee women used their connections to European women to build beneficial ties to settler colonial communities without inviting settler colonial control of their communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207