Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extract © 2022 Berkley Hudson All rights reserved Manufactured in Canada Designed and set by Kim Bryant in Miller and Acie types The University of North Carolina Press has been a member of the Green Press Initiative since 2003. Cover illustration courtesy of the Pruitt-Shanks Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Hudson, Fraser Berkley, author. Title: O.N. Pruitt’s Possum Town : photographing trouble and resistance in the American South / Berkley Hudson. Other titles: Documentary arts and culture. Description: Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina Press ; [Durham, North Carolina] : Published in association with the Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University, 2021. | Series: Documentary arts and culture | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2021038334 | ISBN 9781469662701 (cloth ; alk. paper) | ISBN 9781469662718 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Pruitt, O. N., 1891–1967. | Documentary photography—
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.911 | 0.870 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".