MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of pre-operative ctDNA in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

2024· article· en· W4391091200 on OpenAlexaff
Woo Jin Choi, Zhihao Li, Christian Tibor Josef Magyar, Antony Tin, Erik Spickard, Himanshu Sethi, Minetta C. Liu, Roxana Bucur, Robert C. Grant, Arndt Vogel, Jennifer J. Knox, Geoffrey Liu, Steven Gallinger, Gonzalo Sapisochín, Grainne M. O’Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatera
KeywordsMedicineIDH1Circulating tumor DNAInternal medicineConfidence intervalGastroenterologyStage (stratigraphy)OncologyCancerMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

528 Background: Genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) to inform precision oncology approaches and determine resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies. The application of pre-operative ctDNA testing in the management of iCCA for prognostication remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed pre-operative plasma samples from 14 patients who underwent curative resection for iCCA without neoadjuvant therapy. A personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc.) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA. We correlated ctDNA profiles with baseline tumour characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results: The mean interval between pre-operative blood collection and surgery was 43 days (range: 1 to 90 days). ctDNA was detected in all patients except for one with stage Ia (AJCC 8th) disease (Table). The mean pre-operative ctDNA concentration was lowest in the stage Ia group [4.2 mean tumor molecules (MTM)/mL] and highest in the stage II group (134.0 MTM/mL). The mean pre-operative ctDNA concentration did not exhibit a linear correlation with disease recurrence or mortality rates, however, it showed a moderate-to-good linear correlation with the largest pathologic tumor size (R2 = 0.55). Among the three patients who had IDH1/2 mutations tracked in the plasma by Signatera, two patients had positive IDH1/2 detection in ctDNA with mean ctDNA concentrations of 83.7 MTM/mL (range: 33.8 to 133.5 MTM/mL). The patient with the second-highest ctDNA concentration (133.5 MTM/mL and 1818 days follow-up) had stage Ib disease with an IDH1 mutation but has shown no evidence of recurrence. Conclusions: In the pre-operative setting for iCCA resections, ctDNA can be reliably detected across all disease stages using a tumor-informed approach, even when blood is collected up to 90 days before surgery. While single time-point pre-operative ctDNA concentration levels do not appear to correlate with outcomes, similar to previous reports in colon adenocarcinoma, they may correlate with tumor volume. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of tumor-informed ctDNA testing in the post-operative setting to detect molecular residual disease for improved prognostication. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207