MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lightweight CNN based on Spatial Features for a Vehicular Damage Detection System

2023· article· en· W4391093474 on OpenAlexaff
Dawid Połap, Antoni Jaszcz, Katarzyna Prokop, Gautam Srivastava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersSilesian University of Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceRegularization (linguistics)Automotive industryKey (lock)Transfer of learningDropout (neural networks)ArchitectureComputer visionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous vehicles are a key element of the automotive industry, where the impact of the human factor on the condition of the vehicle and driving is minimized. An important element is the analysis of vehicular condition, which allows maintainence of its value and correct operation. We propose a system based on the analysis of the image of vehicles, which determines whether there is any damage. For this purpose, we propose a new model of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that has 0. 395M trained values. The architecture of the network is adapted to the analysis of spatial features that allow networks to be adapted to analyze primarily vehicular shape and orientation in relation to other objects. The model also implements spatial dropout and regularization techniques for preventing overtraining and maintaining model generalization. The modeled architecture contributes to obtaining high classification accuracy at 94.78% using a public database and exceeding metrics of known transfer learning models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207