Baseline Structural Connectomics Data of Healthy Brain Development Assessed with Multi-Modal Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography is a powerful tool for non-invasively studying brain architecture and structural integrity by inferring fiber tracts based on water diffusion profiles. This study provided a thorough set of baseline data of structural connectomics biomarkers for 809 healthy participants between the ages of 1 and 35 years. The data provided can help to identify potential biomarkers that may be helpful in characterizing physiological and anatomical neurodevelopmental changes linked with healthy brain maturation and can be used as a baseline for comparing abnormal and pathological development in future studies. Our results demonstrate statistically significant differences between the sexes, representing a potentially important baseline from which to establish healthy growth trajectories. Biomarkers that correlated with age, potentially representing useful methods for assessing brain development, are also presented. This baseline information may facilitate studies that identify abnormal brain development associated with a variety of pathological conditions as departures from healthy sex-specific age-dependent neural development. Our findings are the result of combining the use of mainstream analytic methods with in-house-developed open-source software to help facilitate reproducible analyses, inclusive of many potential biomarkers that cannot be derived from existing software packages. Assessing relationships between our identified regional tract measurements produced by our technology and participant characteristics/phenotypic data in future analyses has tremendous potential for the study of human neurodevelopment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".