Battery State of Health Estimation Using the Sliding Interacting Multiple Model Strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to their nonlinear behavior and the harsh environments to which batteries are subjected, they require a robust battery monitoring system (BMS) that accurately estimates their state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) to ensure each battery’s safe operation. In this study, the interacting multiple model (IMM) algorithm is implemented in conjunction with an estimation strategy to accurately estimate the SOH and SOC of batteries under cycling conditions. The IMM allows for an adaptive mechanism to account for the decaying battery capacity while the battery is in use. The proposed strategy utilizes the sliding innovation filter (SIF) to estimate the SOC while the IMM serves as a process to update the parameter values of the battery model as the battery ages. The performance of the proposed strategy was tested using the well-known B005 battery dataset available at NASA’s Prognostic Data Repository. This strategy partitions the experimental dataset to build a database of different SOH models of the battery, allowing the IMM to select the most accurate representation of the battery’s current conditions while in operation, thus determining the current SOH of the battery. Future work in the area of battery retirement is also considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".