Extrinsic Calibration of Thermal Camera and 3D LiDAR Sensor via Human Matching in Both Modalities during Sensor Setup Movement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LiDAR sensors, pivotal in various fields like agriculture and robotics for tasks such as 3D object detection and map creation, are increasingly coupled with thermal cameras to harness heat information. This combination proves particularly effective in adverse conditions like darkness and rain. Ensuring seamless fusion between the sensors necessitates precise extrinsic calibration. Our innovative calibration method leverages human presence during sensor setup movements, eliminating the reliance on dedicated calibration targets. It optimizes extrinsic parameters by employing a novel evolutionary algorithm on a specifically designed loss function that measures human alignment across modalities. Our approach showcases a notable 4.43% improvement in the loss over extrinsic parameters obtained from target-based calibration in the FieldSAFE dataset. This advancement reduces costs related to target creation, saves time in diverse pose collection, mitigates repetitive calibration efforts amid sensor drift or setting changes, and broadens accessibility by obviating the need for specific targets. The adaptability of our method in various environments, like urban streets or expansive farm fields, stems from leveraging the ubiquitous presence of humans. Our method presents an efficient, cost-effective, and readily applicable means of extrinsic calibration, enhancing sensor fusion capabilities in the critical fields reliant on precise and robust data acquisition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".