MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391102432 · doi:10.1002/cey2.426

Recent progress on mechanisms, principles, and strategies for high‐activity and high‐stability non‐PGM fuel cell catalyst design

2024· article· en· W4391102432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarbon Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisDurabilityActive siteCommercializationOxygen reduction reactionMaterials scienceNanotechnologyBiochemical engineeringChemical engineeringChemistryEngineeringElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryBusinessComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The commercialization of a polymer membrane H 2 –O 2 fuel cell and its widespread use call for the development of cost‐effective oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) nonplatinum group metal (NPGM) catalysts. Nevertheless, to meet the requests for the real‐world fuel cell application and replacing platinum catalysts, it still needs to address some challenges for NPGM catalysts regarding the sluggish ORR kinetics in the cathode and their poor durability in acidic environment. In response to these issues, numerous efforts have been made to study NPGM catalysts both theoretically and experimentally, developed these into the atomically dispersed coordinated metal–nitrogen–carbon (M–N–C) form over the past decades. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of recent advancements on NPGM catalysts with high activity and durability. Catalyst design strategies in terms of optimizing active‐site density and enhancing catalyst stability against demetalization and carbon corrosion are highlighted. It is also emphasized the importance of understanding the mechanisms and principles behind those strategies through a combination of theoretical modeling and experimental work. Especially, further understanding the mechanisms related to the active‐site structure and the formation process of the single‐atom active site under pyrolysis conditions is critical for active‐site engineering. Optimizing the active‐site distance is the basic principle for improving catalyst activity through increasing the catalyst active‐site density. Theoretical studies for the catalyst deactivation mechanism and modeling stable active‐site structures provide both mechanisms and principles to improve the NPGM catalyst durability. Finally, currently remained challenges and perspectives in the future on designing high‐performance atomically dispersed NPGM catalysts toward fuel cell application are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it