MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391103897 · doi:10.1080/21680566.2024.2303042

A framework for transportation and land use integration as a parallel constrained multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (PC-MDCEV) home production model

2024· article· en· W4391103897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jason Hawkins, Khandker Nurul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportmetrica B Transport Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Discrete choiceConsumption (sociology)Computer scienceEmpirical researchFunction (biology)Land useScale (ratio)Value (mathematics)Extreme value theorySubdivisionEconometricsEconomicsMicroeconomicsOperations researchMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a microeconomic foundation for transportation and land use choice model integration based on the theory of home production. A utility function is developed that considers both household monetary expenditure and individual time use. We introduce a parallel constrained multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) structure that allows for the inclusion of multi-person households in the model. An empirical application is provided for the Greater Toronto Area using a validated synthetic dataset. Empirical results demonstrate an economy of scale in time devoted to home production, analogous to scaling exhibit in market production. It was found that the mix of dwelling types (detached, apartment, etc.) has a significant influence on both time use and consumption. Finally, we provide several directions for future research to advance the practice of urban modelling and better capture the complex dynamics of household decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportmetrica B Transport DynamicsSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207