Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien di Rumah Sakit Graha Delta Husada RSUD Sidoarjo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research is aiming to analyze the effect of service quality consisting of, Attitutude and behavior, Accessibility and Flexibility, dan Reliability and Trustworthness to customer satisfaction, where customer satisfaction is meant by patient satisfaction. The respondents used in this research were patients of Graha Delta Husada RSUD Sidoarjo aged 21 to 60 years who underwent hospitalization in standard care rooms for more than 1 day and had passed the initial action (patients entered through emergency installations or polyspecialists), totaling 60 people. Based on the calculation of F test, a calculated F value of 42.107 was obtained with a significant level of 0.000 smaller than (α) 0.05, so that simultaneously the quality of service consisting of: Attitude and behavior, Accessibility and flexibility, Reliability and trustworthness has a significant influence on patient satisfaction at Graha Delta Husada RSUD Sidoarjo. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kualitas pelayanan yang terdiri dari, Sikap dan perilaku, Aksesibilitas dan Fleksibilitas, serta Keandalan dan Kepercayaan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan, dimana kepuasan pelanggan yang dimaksud adalah kepuasan pasien. Responden yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pasien Graha Delta Husada RSUD Sidoarjo berusia 21 hingga 60 tahun yang menjalani rawat inap di ruang perawatan standar lebih dari 1 hari dan telah melewati tindakan awal (pasien masuk melalui instalasi gawat darurat atau polispesialis) yang berjumlah 60 orang. . Berdasarkan perhitungan uji F diperoleh nilai F hitung sebesar 42,107 dengan tingkat signifikan 0,000 lebih kecil dari (α) 0,05, sehingga secara simultan kualitas pelayanan terdiri dari : Sikap dan perilaku, Aksesibilitas dan fleksibilitas, Keandalan dan dapat dipercaya. mempunyai sebuah pengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan pasien di Graha Delta Husada RSUD Sidoarjo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".