Allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass carbon in five tree species grown in an intercropping agroforestry system in southern Ontario, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Allometric equations were developed for estimating aboveground biomass carbon (AGBC) in five tree species grown in a tree-based intercropping system at the University of Guelph Agroforestry Research Station, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. A total of 66 representative trees from five species: red oak ( Quercus rubra ) [n = 12], black walnut ( Juglans nigra ) [n = 16], black locust ( Robinia pseudoacacia ) [n = 10], white ash ( Fraxinus americana ) [n = 15], Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) [n = 13] were selected, harvested and their aboveground biomass and carbon content were quantified. Three commonly used allometric models were used to develop predictive equations. Regression models were developed and parameterized for each tree species and the best are presented based on information criteria (AIC, AICc, and BIC), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), over/under estimation (MOUE), root mean square error (RMSE), R 2 , and regression coefficients (a, b) of the observed/predicted (OP) linear regression analysis. All equations with diameter at breast height (D) only and D and tree height (H) as the predictor variables fitted the AGBC data well, with R 2 > 97% and RMSE < 40. However, a power model using D as the only predictor is recommended as the best model for black walnut, black locust, white ash, and Norway spruce. The models presented are the best fitted allometric equations for the indicated species and are recommended for these species, growing on similar soils under the same temperate conditions at densities of < 125 tree per hectare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it