MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391113548 · doi:10.5216/ci.v26.76174

Hoje, a verdade é algorítmica?

2023· article· pt· W4391113548 on OpenAlexaff
Gisele Gallicchio

Bibliographic record

VenueComunicação & Informação · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyCapital (architecture)Art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo parte de uma perspectiva filosófica que problematiza o termo “pós-verdade” e seus usos, especialmente, àqueles relacionados à produção de fake news para, através de uma abordagem foucaultiana e deleuze-guattariana, propor uma breve análise acerca do deslocamento do regime de verdade ocorrido nas sociedades de controle. Neste sentido, distingue a “verdade-episteme” da “verdade algorítmica”, apresentando um movimento atrelado às máquinas comunicacionais e informatizadas que investem na produção da subjetividade, bem como asseguram a governamentalidade cibernética, endossando uma política de eliminação e de extermínio, a qual se encontra alinhada à reprodução e à ampliação do sistema e da lógica capitalística.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.017
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComunicação & Informação→Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security→French-language works237,207→