MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391120005 · doi:10.23880/nhij-16000291

Integrating Menstrual Health

2023· article· en· W4391120005 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rehan Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing & Healthcare International Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMenstruationDignityReproductive healthShameEmpowermentMedicinePsychologyPopulationEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menstruation is an herbal and quintessential vicinity of the reproductive cycle; 1/2 of the human populace has or will trip it. Menstrual Health (MH) is a quintessential phase of sexual fitness and rights. Access to Menstrual Health is, In addition, a human appropriate and necessary to public health. MH is fundamental for the fitness well-being mobility, education, monetary empowerment, and dignity of women, girls, and human beings who menstruate. Yet shame, stigma, and misinformation surrounding the menstrual existence cycle undermine the well-being of women, girls, and those who menstruate, making them inclined to gender discrimination, infant marriage, exclusion, violence, poverty, and untreated fitness problems. Enabling women, girls, and those who menstruate to manipulate their menstruation, and, barring shame, let them issue out their dignity, agency, and autonomy and revel in wonderful human rights. It affords them with wishes and manipulation of their bodies and lives 2020 used to be 12 months of pain, pause, and adaptation for billions of human beings spherical in the world. The COVID-19 Pandemic disrupted the fitness shipping machine at a magnitude that ushered in a new world. It, in addition, affected girls’ and women’s administration to manipulate their menstruation and their health. Integrating menstrual health into healthcare systems is crucial, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has disrupted healthcare services, including access to menstrual health products and services, which has disproportionately affected women, girls, and those who menstruate. As a result, there is a need to prioritize and integrate menstrual health into the broader healthcare system to ensure that everyone has access to menstrual health products, information, and services. This integration will help to reduce the stigma surrounding menstruation, improve education on menstrual health, and empower women, girls, and those who menstruate to take control of their menstrual health. It will also help to ensure that menstrual health is recognized as a human right and is incorporated into public health policies and programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing & Healthcare International JournalSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207