MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391123128 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.123.045015

Sex Differences in Outcomes of Late-Window Endovascular Stroke Therapy

2024· article· en· W4391123128 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Abdalkader, Muhammad M. Qureshi, Diogo C Haussen, Daniel Strbian, Simon Nagel, Jelle Demeestere, Volker Puetz, Mahmoud Mohammaden, Marta Olivé‐Gadea, Simon Winzer, Hiroshi Yamagami, Kanta Tanaka, João Pedro Marto, Liisa Tomppo, Hilde Hénon, Sunil A. Sheth, Santiago Ortega‐Gutiérrez, Nicolas Martinez‐Majander, François Caparros, Robin Lemmens, Anne Dusart, Flavio Bellante, Syed Zaidi, James E. Siegler, Stefania Nannoni, Johannes Kaesmacher, Tomas Dobrocky, Mudassir Farooqui, Sergio Salazar‐Marioni, Pekka Virtanen, Lieselotte Vandewalle, Anke Wouters, Jessica Jesser, Rita Ventura, Alicia C. Castonguay, Kazutaka Uchida, Ajit S Puri, Hesham Masoud, Piers Klein, Zain Mansoor, Jenny Bui, Matthew C. Kang, Adnan Mujanović, Federica Rizzo, Tatu Kokkonen, João Nuno Ramos, Davide Strambo, Patrik Michel, Markus Möhlenbruch, Eugene Lin, Daniel Kaiser, Shinichi Yoshimura, Nobuyuki Sakai, Charlotte Cordonnier, Peter A. Ringleb, Daniel Roy, Osama O. Zaidat, Urs Fischer, Marc Ribó, Jean Raymond, Raul G. Nogueira, Thanh N. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Police ServiceMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleOdds ratioStroke (engine)Atrial fibrillationInternal medicineObservational studyIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The association between sex and outcome after endovascular thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between men and women treated with endovascular thrombectomy in the late 6-to-24-hour window period. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy of anterior circulation stroke in the late window from 66 clinical sites in 10 countries from January 2014 to May 2022. The primary outcome was the 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale score. Secondary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (FI), return of Rankin (RoR) to prestroke baseline, FI or RoR, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Multivariable and inverse probability of treatment weighting methods were used. We explored the interaction of sex with baseline characteristics on the outcomes ordinal modified Rankin Scale and FI or RoR. RESULTS: Of 1932 patients, 1055 were women and 877 were men. Women were older (77 versus 69 years), had higher rates of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and greater prestroke disability, but there was no difference in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed no difference between women and men in ordinal modified Rankin Scale (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.79-1.21]), FI or RoR (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.78-1.22]), severe disability or mortality (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80-1.23]). The multivariable analysis of the above end points was concordant. There were no interactions between baseline characteristics and sex on the outcomes of ordinal modified Rankin Scale and FI or RoR. CONCLUSIONS: In late presenting patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy in the 6 to 24-hour window, there was no difference in clinical or safety outcomes between men and women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207