MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391126389 · doi:10.1093/ehr/cead097

Learning Empire: Globalization and the German Quest for World Status, 1875–1919, by Erik Grimmer-Solem

2023· article· en· W4391126389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireGermanPoliticsNationalismScholarshipGlobalizationPolitical scienceGeopoliticsSociologyClassicsHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How influential is academic scholarship?While many of us may strive to produce socially relevant work with a modest degree of 'impact', Erik Grimmer-Solem's book focuses on a small group of scholars in Wilhelmine Germany who, it seems, greatly influenced German global politics up to and including the First World War.The book links the individual stories of these middleclass political economists with the 'high politics' of the likes of Tirpitz, Bülow, Kaiser Wilhelm II and the German foreign office (p.21), demonstrating the remarkable salience of liberal imperial thought from the late nineteenth century through the First World War.Grimmer-Solem thus joins recent scholars in taking on the Fischer school, whose advocates have long claimed that a nationalist quest for Weltmacht and expansion rooted in Imperial Germany was responsible for the First World War as much as the Second.The author's aim is ambitiously formulated: 'a novel retelling of the entire history of the German Empire from a simultaneously local prosopographical and global perspective' (p.24).A tall order, indeed.Although Grimmer-Solem alludes in his introduction to the role of the German university 'as a node of global connection that brought the world to Germany' (p.7), this study is really more about a group of individuals and their personal and scholarly networks than the actual institutions in which they were embedded.It thus resonates with recent work on intellectual networks and empire, and particularly with Tamson Pietsch's Empire of Scholars: Universities, Networks and the British Academic World, 1850World, -1939World, (2013)).It makes an important contribution to our understanding of the German academic world, at the same time demonstrating its global entanglements.The book is organised into three parts, moving chronologically from ' Absent-Minded Empire, 1875-1897', through 'Empire Imagined, 1897-1907', to 'Empire Lost, 1908-1919'.A total of twelve chapters interweave developments in the lives of the main subjects with major domestic and foreign policy debates.Drawing largely on unpublished or under-used personal papers and accounts as well as an impressive array of secondary literature, Grimmer-Solem takes us on the intellectual and geographical journeys of six scholars, all of whom studied under the economist Gustav Schmoller.We travel with Ernst von Halle to the United States in 1893-4, with Karl Rathgen to Korea, China and Japan in 1886 and 1890, and later to the American South, the Caribbean, Panama and Honduras.We accompany Hermann Schumacher to the US and Cuba in 1907 and to Malaya, Java and Sumatra in 1911.We trace Max Sering's route through the US and Canada in 1883 and track the connections Karl Helfferich made in Cairo.We witness how the American Henry Farnam, having studied in Germany, continued to facilitate intellectual exchange between the two countries until the outbreak of the First World War, when he was just about to begin an academic exchange in Berlin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it