MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391127454 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc118-15

Recent Development of Lens Array Fabrication: A Review

2023· review· en· W4391127454 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sunjieyu Wang, Yubo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)FabricationMathematicsDevelopment (topology)OpticsMathematical analysisPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lens array is a multi-functional optical element, which can modulate the incident light such as diffusion, beam shaping, light splitting, and optical focusing, thereby achieving large viewing angle, low aberration, small distortion, high temporal resolution, and infinite depth of field. Meanwhile, it has important application potential in the form, intelligence and integration of op-to electronic devices and optical systems. In this paper, the optical principle and development history of lens arrays are introduced, and the lens array fabrication technologies such as ink jet printing, laser direct writing, screen printing, photo lithography, photo polymerization, hot melt reflow and chemical vapor deposition are reviewed. The application progress of lens arrays in imaging sensing, illumination light source, display and photovoltaic fields is presented. And this paper prospected the development direction of lens arrays, and discussed the development trends and future challenges of new directions such as curved lenses, superimposed compound eye systems, and the combination of lenses and new op-to electronic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced optical system designFrench-language works237,207