MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391127467 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc118-06

Design of Brand Culture Mental Model Based on Human-Computer Interaction in Artistic Visual Expression

2023· article· en· W4391127467 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heyao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpression (computer science)Mental modelMental imageHuman–computer interactionMathematicsAdvertisingAestheticsComputer scienceMultimediaArtComputer graphics (images)PsychologyBusinessCognitive scienceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, people look at a brand not only to see the value of the brand itself, but to understand the cultural value conveyed behind the brand and experience the connotation of the brand culture. Human-computer interaction technology has also gained more application space with the development of the times. Therefore, a psychological model of brand culture based on human-computer interaction was designed in this paper, and a survey of related content was conducted. In terms of user satisfaction survey, it was concluded that the use of the brand culture mental model based on human-computer interaction technology could greatly improve users’ satisfaction with brand culture and make more people love brand culture; in terms of user participation survey, it was concluded that the brand culture mental model designed based on human-computer interaction technology could achieve better profit results at 21:00 on Sunday. Finally, a survey of user stickiness was carried out, and the test results showed that the brand culture mental model based on human-computer interaction technology established the stickiness between users and brands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207