MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391128486 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3354064

Decentralized Edge Collaboration for Seamless Handover Authentication in Zero-Trust IoV

2024· article· en· W4391128486 on OpenAlexaff
He Fang, Yongxu Zhu, Yan Zhang, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsComputer scienceHandoverComputer networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAuthentication (law)Zero (linguistics)Zero-knowledge proofComputer securityCryptographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the frequently changing and potentially unreliable environment, the seamless handover authentication is essential to achieve zero-trust Internet of Vehicles (IoV) network with dramatically enhanced communication and transportation safety. The traditional centralized handover authentication schemes may suffer from the excessive latency and situation agnostic limitation, leading to potential interruption of critical services for fast moving vehicles. To overcome the above challenges, this paper proposes a novel decentralized edge collaboration-based handover authentication scheme with the assistance of blockchain for providing continuous protections in zero-trust IoV. A distributed learning process is designed by involving multiple authentication cooperators (ACs) to collect device/location-related features of vehicles at network edge and then to verify their identities. During the movement of vehicles, the access point (AP) could select new ACs by transferring the security information from existing ACs to the new members for seamless handover authentication. A situation-aware AC selection and update algorithm is proposed for maximizing handover authentication accuracy. Moreover, a hierarchical blockchain-assisted security information transfer and reputation management mechanism is designed for reliable collaboration and efficient management in zero-trust IoV. Compared with the existing schemes, our results characterize the outperformance of the proposed scheme in authentication accuracy and time cost of handover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityFrench-language works237,207