MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391134071 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3869119/v1

Improved Feature Space for EEG-based Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Signal Processing Techniques

2024· preprint· en· W4391134071 on OpenAlexaff
M. P. R. S. Kiran, Mahendra Shridhar Naik, J. Yashwanth, Kiran kumar humse, S Chaitra, T. Deepa, D. Sunilkumar

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpileptic seizurePattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Computer scienceSignal processingEpilepsySIGNAL (programming language)Artificial intelligenceSpace (punctuation)Speech recognitionNeurosciencePsychologyDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The non-stationary nature of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal makes its analysis essential as it may point the way toward an appropriate detection technique for patients with neurological disorders, particularly epilepsy. The quality of certain variables extracted from an EEG data set that describe seizure activity is a major determinant of the effectiveness of EEG-based epileptic seizure detection. The Improved Feature Space Method (ICFS) with Discrete Wavelet Transforms (DWT) is a unique analysis technique presented in this paper for identifying epileptic seizures from EEG signals. The proposed study includes using DWT to identify the most salient characteristics from the time domain, frequency domain, and entropy-based features after first using FIR for the filtering process. After that, an ensemble of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers is trained using the chosen feature set. Based on the same benchmark EEG dataset, the experimental results reveal that the suggested method performs better than the traditional correlation-based method and also surpasses several other state-of-the-art methods of epileptic seizure detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207