MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391134773 · doi:10.3390/waste2010003

Anaerobic Treatment of Food Waste with Biogas Recirculation under Psychrophilic Temperature

2024· article· en· W4391134773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWaste · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsPsychrophileBiogasFood wasteAnaerobic exerciseWaste managementEnvironmental scienceBiogas productionAnaerobic digestionMethaneBiologyEngineeringEcologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food waste has emerged as a pressing concern, and thus advanced techniques to valorize food waste into nutrition rich materials as well as renewable energy are highly important. The exceptional biodegradability of food waste renders it a highly suitable substrate for anaerobic treatment. This leads to energy production and a reduction in the carbon footprint. Nevertheless, in frigid territories like Canada, the conventional mesophilic anaerobic digestion at 30–40 °C can require substantial amounts of energy. Consequently, this study introduces a new approach to treat food waste at psychrophilic temperatures (1–20 °C). Lower temperatures can negatively impact cellular processes during anaerobic treatment, rendering substrates less accessible to microscopic organisms. To address this challenge associated with lower temperatures, the study introduces an innovative biogas recirculation strategy. The primary objectives of this study are to assess the viability of anaerobic treatment for food waste at psychrophilic temperatures and to investigate the effectiveness of reintroduction of the produced biogas to the anaerobic system in enhancing biomethane generation and stability of the system. Batch experiments were conducted on food waste in various assessments, both with and without biogas recirculation. The outcomes revealed a methane concentration ranging from 68% to 93% when biogas recirculation was employed, whereas without this technique, methane concentration varied between 10% and 45%. Moreover, with biogas recirculation, the reduction in volatile solids reached a maximum of 92%, and there was an 82% decrease in chemical oxygen demand. In conclusion, the utilization of the recirculation of biogas at the psychrophilic temperature range enhanced biomethane production and reduction of volatile solids and chemical oxygen demand. This study underscores the potential of employing anaerobic treatment with reintroduction of produced biogas into the system in cold regions as an economically viable and sustainable choice for treating food waste with nominal energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it