Mass-spring model for acoustic metamaterials consisting of a compact linear periodic array of dead-end resonators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a mass-spring model to predict the normal incidence acoustic response of a metamaterial composed of a compact linear periodic array of dead-end resonators. The dead-end resonators considered are ring-shaped Helmholtz resonators. The model is based on a mass-spring analogy and considers the thermoviscous losses in the metamaterial following an effective fluid approach. A matrix equation of acoustic motion is derived for the finite case of N-periodic arrays. Under external excitation, its direct solution predicts the sound absorption coefficient and transmission loss. Under the homogeneous case, the solution of its associated eigenvalue problem predicts the acoustic eigenfrequencies and mode shapes. The dispersion relation is also solved to predict the beginning of the first stopband, and a low frequency approximation allows development of a formula to estimate the first eigenfrequency. The results show that the system with N degrees of freedom has three stopbands over the frequency range studied, with zero sound absorption and transmission. The model also helps to understand how the acoustic dissipation, at a given resonant frequency, is affected by the position of the acoustic velocity nodes (eigenmodes) in the geometry of the metamaterial. Prototypes are designed, manufactured, and tested in an impedance tube to validate the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".