MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391135792 · doi:10.7202/1108451ar

Le droit de l’enfant et l’instruction à la citoyenneté à l’aune de l’article 29 de la convention internationale des droits de l’enfant : une étude interdisciplinaire

2024· article· fr· W4391135792 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hesam Seyyed Esfahani

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article 29 de la Convention internationale des droits de l’enfant (CIDE) reflète un accord minimum au niveau mondial sur les objectifs fondamentaux de l’éducation. L’un des principaux objectifs est l’éducation à la citoyenneté, qui permet à l’enfant de participer à la vie démocratique en exerçant pleinement ses droits et ses obligations à l’égard d’autrui et de la société. Cette notion toujours en construction est liée, d’une part, aux valeurs démocratiques et aux droits de l’Homme, et, d’autre part, à la paix et au développement. L’instruction à la citoyenneté doit obligatoirement comprendre l’éducation aux droits de l’Homme qui prend en compte le respect de chaque être humain. Après avoir examiné les droits de l’Homme comme moyen d’instruction à la citoyenneté, l’application de l’article 29 de la CIDE en droit interne est analysée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.018
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207