On the Outflow Boundary Opening Size for Internal Erosion Testing of Widely Graded Sand and Gravel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Permeameter testing of a widely graded soil to evaluate its potential for internal instability requires the opening size of the outflow boundary to allow unstable finer fraction particles to pass while retaining the stable coarser fraction. Results from a parametric study, on three widely graded soils and five outflow boundaries, yielded paired-data for opening size Om and d85,e of eroded soil mass passing through the outflow boundary. Gradation shape analysis established d85′ of the finer fraction of each soil used in testing. An opening size ratio 5 ≤ Om/d85′ ≤ 10 correlates with a grain size ratio 1 ≤ d85,e/d85′ ≤ 2 and thus an eroded soil mass believed representative of the finer fraction of the widely graded soil. The novel Om/d85′ criterion for sizing the outflow boundary in permeameter testing is found consistent with an alternate criterion using concepts of base-filter incompatibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".