PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN, HARGA DAN KEPUASAN TERHADAP LOYALITAS KONSUMEN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kualitas pelayanan, harga, dan kepuasan terhadap loyalitas konsumen. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei dan analisis jalur. Populasi adalah 940 orang konsumen. Dengan teknik simple random sampling diperoleh 91 orang responden. Data dianalisis menggunakan Excell dan SPSS versi 25.00. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: Kualitas pelayanan berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen sebesar 0,281; Harga berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen sebesar 0,544; Kualitas pelayanan berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas konsumen sebesar 0,247; Harga berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas konsumen sebesar 0,289; Kepuasan berpengaruh langsung positif dan signifikan terhadap loyalitas konsumen sebesar 0,492.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it